On-chain tier computation
Staked balances read at published snapshot times, with tiers computed in contracts so qualification is verifiable rather than discretionary.
AI-Built BSCPad Clone
An AI-first build of every BSCPad mechanic: tiers computed from on-chain staking at published snapshots, allocations enforced inside the sale contract, and participation intelligence that keeps rounds full. Four synced panels ship white-label with 100% source code, owned by you from day one. The almost-ready AI build goes live in 6 working days; a custom build takes 3 to 4 weeks.
Launch-ready from
$2,799

Synced panels
Almost-ready AI launch
Custom build
Source-code ownership
Canonical Moxace facts.
overview
A BSCPad-style tiered IDO platform is a launchpad where investor allocation is earned by staking the platform's token: staked balances are read on-chain at published snapshots, tiers are computed from those balances, and guaranteed or lottery allocation rounds run inside the sale contract.
Its purpose is to align platform economics with participation. Investors stake to hold or improve their tier, projects get a committed, qualifying audience rather than a mercenary whitelist, and the operator earns listing fees and a percentage of raises while the staking requirement gives the platform token persistent, lock-period-backed demand. That alignment, not the sale page, is why operators launch tiered pads.
The platform includes an investor app with tier tracking and claim portals, a staking portal for single-token and LP positions, a project panel for configuring sales and vesting, and an admin panel over approvals, tier structures, and fees, with tier and sale contracts enforcing allocation on-chain.
Market context, hedged: tier-based IDO allocation remains one of the most durable launchpad models because it gives sophisticated investors a verifiable qualification path, a pattern DeFi commentators have noted across multiple market cycles. We avoid unsourced figures, and the build is framed compliance-first: the pad provides allocation infrastructure and verified process, it does not rate tokens as investments.
The headline capabilities, at product level.
Staked balances read at published snapshot times, with tiers computed in contracts so qualification is verifiable rather than discretionary.
Single-token and LP staking with lock periods, reward accrual, and snapshot timing published in advance.
Both allocation modes run inside the sale contract, so round structure is enforced by code, not a back-office list.
Registration windows, qualification rules, and caps checked before contribution inside the contract.
Cliff and linear schedules deploy as on-chain contracts the claim portal reads directly, removing post-sale disputes.
Historical sale results published openly, which is what repeat IDO participants check before staking.
Major EVM chains with per-chain deployment and fee configuration from the admin panel.
What these buyers share: willingness to commit to a token economy and publish verifiable tier math. If you bring the community, the platform side is the part we handle.
Launching on chains without a dominant local pad, where being the credible venue is a clear win. The tiering core runs the math while you curate the deal flow.
Convert your community into tiered participants, with staking demand behind the token and allocation mechanics your holders can verify.
Complete the lifecycle from launch to liquidity by adding a pad beside your swap or yield products, on shared infrastructure.
Deploy the white-label build for chain foundations and ecosystem funds, every deployment standalone on 100% source code.
Formalize allocation with verifiable tiers instead of spreadsheets, for memberships that expect the math to be auditable.
Every panel below ships in every build.
Tier-based participation, clearly signposted.
Where tier power comes from.
Run the sale, publish the terms.
Platform operations from one console.
Four consoles, one view of the venue's tier economics and revenue position.
The project approval queue, screening-threshold policy, tier-structure configuration, and featured-placement scheduling. Every approval decision lands on an audit trail, which is what makes your curation defensible to a tier-holding audience.
Listing-fee tiers by raise size, the platform percentage on raised funds, service-bundle pricing, featured-placement rates, and staking-program economics, all editable without a code release and all visible to the projects paying them.
Chain management with per-chain deployment scripts, snapshot-schedule policy, tier and vesting contract upgrades behind timelocks, and staking-system oversight, so multi-chain operations stay consistent as you add networks.
Revenue dashboards across every monetization line, tier-population and staking analytics, participation patterns, and regulator-ready exports, so the numbers your board and your compliance reviewers ask for are already generated.
From staking to final claim, the core participation flow.
The investor stakes platform tokens or LP tokens in the staking portal, chooses a lock period, and watches the tier tracker show which allocation bands they qualify for.
When an IDO opens, qualified investors register during the whitelist window, and snapshot timing is published in advance so qualification is deterministic.
At snapshot, tier contracts read staked balances on-chain and grant guaranteed or lottery allocations per the round's structure. No back-office list decides who gets in.
Participants contribute up to their allocation cap within the sale window, with the contribution window, price, and cap visible in the sale terms before committing.
After the sale closes, the claim portal reads the project's on-chain vesting schedule and releases tokens as cliffs and linear periods pass, with proofs rather than promises.
Past-sale pages show historical performance, and investors restake or adjust lock periods to hold or improve their tier for the next round.
Five model-driven systems working the same participation stream. Each ships pre-tuned for tiered IDOs and sharpens as your data compounds.
Scores projects in the approval queue from team signals, contract data, and community history, so reviews start from structured evidence.
Application data, contract signals, team history
Consistent approval standards that investors can verify
Models tier participation and allocation demand so you size rounds and set tier boundaries from evidence rather than guesswork.
Staking distribution, tier populations, sale history
Rounds sized to real demand, fewer undersold sales
Watches stake and unstake patterns around snapshots and suggests lock strategies that keep qualification stable for investors.
Staking flows, lock periods, snapshot timing
Stable tier populations and less snapshot gaming
Flags unusual contribution behavior in sales so review happens before finalize rather than after complaints.
Contribution timing, wallet linkage, registration data
Cleaner allocation records and fewer disputes
Ranks sale listings per investor by screening score, category interest, and participation history, so relevant launches surface first.
Browse history, participation records, tier data
Better-matched contributors and faster sale fills
Four groups, each mapped to the part of the tiered-IDO loop it protects or accelerates.
On-chain tier computation at published snapshots, guaranteed and lottery allocation modes, allocation caps per tier, and whitelist automation checked inside the contract, so qualification is arithmetic rather than a back-office list.
Single-token and LP staking with lock periods and reward accrual, plus cliff and linear vesting portals that read on-chain schedules directly. This group is where tier demand and post-sale trust both live.
IDO creation wizards, tier allocation configuration, whitelist imports, sale documentation, and sale analytics for project teams, so launches run as workflows rather than scripts.
Past-performance pages, governance and voting modules, multi-language support, and featured placements, so each sale brings its audience and your pad compounds attention across rounds.
platform concepts
The core concept is the participation state machine: an investor stakes, qualifies at snapshot, registers, contributes, then claims through vesting, with each transition enforced on-chain. Because tiers are computed from staked balances at published snapshot times, qualification is arithmetic rather than a back-office list, and lock periods stop stake-and-dump behavior at the tier boundary.
The second is pad economics. Project listing fees tier by raise size and promotion package, the platform percentage on raised funds is published per project tier, and featured placements sell openly, so the venue earns on allocation infrastructure rather than on any token's performance. That transparency is what sophisticated IDO audiences check before they commit.
The third is the sale catalog. Sales carry tier structures, allocation modes, whitelist rules, and vesting schedules configured in the project panel and enforced by the deployed contracts, so what investors read is what the code does. That structure is what lets you run guaranteed and lottery rounds side by side, onboard a project with custom vesting, and keep every term auditable after the sale.
insight
Tier-based IDO allocation has proven the most durable launchpad model because it solves the demand problem structurally: allocation is earned by staking the platform's token, so the venue's economics and its participants' incentives point the same direction. Sophisticated IDO audiences choose pads they can verify, and tiers computed on-chain at published snapshots are checkable in a way whitelist spreadsheets never were.
The business consequence is recurring demand. Staking requirements give the platform token persistent, lock-period-backed demand that does not depend on any single sale succeeding, while listing fees, raise percentages, and featured placements monetize the project side. The revenue table below quantifies each line.
Project listing fees per IDO, tiered by sale size and promotion package.
Platform percentage on raised funds, set per project tier in the admin panel.
Featured placements: homepage rotation, category boosts, and announcement slots.
Service bundles: KYC coordination, audit referrals, and marketing packages.
Every rate is admin-configurable, so you can adjust for chain, season, and demand without a code release.
Six monetization lines across the pad, quantified against published industry benchmarks. Every rate is configurable in your admin panel; the figures here are modelling inputs, not projections of your platform's earnings.
| Criteria | Revenue line | How it is charged | Typical range | What sets the ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project listing fees | A fee per IDO, tiered by raise size and promotion package | Commonly a few hundred to several thousand dollars per sale | Deal flow. Curated pipelines into your chain niche keep the calendar full | |
| Percentage of raised funds | A platform share of each successful IDO's proceeds, set per project tier | Launchpads commonly take 1% to 5% of funds raised | Sale success rate. Verifiable tier math keeps qualified participants coming back, which is what fills rounds | |
| Featured placements | Homepage rotation, category boosts, and announcement slots sold per window | Contract-specific per campaign; priced against discovery traffic | Participant attention. Placement sells where tier-holding investors actually browse | |
| Staking-related revenue | Fee share or spread on the staking program that powers tier qualification | Structural: a share of reward mechanics, set per your token design | Token economy strength. The line compounds with the lock-period demand your tiers create | |
| Service bundles | KYC coordination, audit referrals, and marketing packages sold alongside listings | Contract-specific per package | Launch readiness. Bundles monetize the compliance work projects need anyway, on infrastructure you already run | |
| Swap commission | A share of post-launch token swap volume routed through your swap surface | Commonly 0.1% to 0.3% of swap volume | Aftermarket liquidity. Tokens launched on your pad trade somewhere; owning the surface keeps the volume |
Standard inclusions on every engagement, almost-ready or custom. Nine things you never have to ask for.
The complete contracts and application code transfer to you, with documentation and deployment scripts.
Your logo, colors, and domains across the investor app, staking portal, and consoles.
App store and web launch handled end to end, with contracts deployed and nodes switched on.
Wallet connection options configured across major providers, with per-chain deployment scripts included.
Risk screening, allocation analytics, and staking intelligence arrive configured for tiered IDOs, not as raw APIs.
Languages and EVM chain targets configured for your markets during the launch window.
Indexing and event pipelines with autoscaling, so sale pages stay fast at contribution peaks.
Revenue dashboards, sale and tier analytics, and compliance exports so your operations start informed on day one.
Included support window plus product updates covering bug fixes, chain compatibility, and version upgrades.
Fair allocation is a contracts problem, not a spreadsheet.
On-chain tier logic reading staked balances at snapshot times, with guaranteed and lottery allocation modes, so qualification is verifiable rather than discretionary.
Single-token and LP staking with lock periods, reward accrual, and snapshot timing published in advance. Invariant-tested and scoped for third-party audit before mainnet.
Cliff and linear vesting as on-chain schedules with claim proofs, removing post-sale disputes over release terms.
Event-driven indexing feeds tier trackers, sale progress, and historical performance pages. For open presales and anti-rug screening, see our PinkSale-style launchpad.
Wallet SDKs, KYC vendors, analytics services, notification channels, and audit partners ship as configured integrations, so the pad plugs into the stack your ecosystem expects.
Role-based access, timelocked administration, audit logs, and compliance exports come standard, so the process your participants and regulators ask about is already written down.
The almost-ready AI build, day by day. Store review times can add a short buffer outside our control.
Chains, tier structure, and allocation modes locked with a written scope, and your identity applied across all panels.
Tier and sale contracts deployed, staking configured with lock periods and snapshot schedules, wallets connected.
First projects onboarded through the approval queue, and pilot IDOs run end to end: registration, allocation, contribution, vesting claims.
App store submissions with review buffers accounted for, production monitoring on, and full launch with post-launch support and product updates included.
Both tracks ship the same contract core. The difference is time, price structure, and how much you want to change.
| Criteria | Almost-Ready AI Launch | Custom Build |
|---|---|---|
| Time to live | 6 working days from branding handoff | 3 to 4 weeks, scoped before work starts |
| Pricing | Fixed written quote after a short scoping call, no hourly meter | Estimated per module after the discovery call |
| Source code and IP | 100% ownership on delivery | 100% ownership on delivery |
| AI layer | Risk screening, allocation analytics, and staking intelligence pre-tuned | AI services designed around your tier economics |
| Tier model | Snapshot-based tiers with guaranteed and lottery rounds | Any tier design, built to your token economy |
| Chains | Major EVM chains pre-wired | Any target chain, scoped per network |
| Best for | Operators who want to launch this quarter | Teams with bespoke mechanics or a unique model |
$ moxace launch --nowBook a walkthrough of the tier contracts, staking portal, and approval queue on a testnet build, then receive the written scope.
Share your idea
a quick call, no deck required
See the live demo
every screen, admin to user
Launch with source
full code, your brand, your servers
No two launches price the same. These are the factors that shape the written quote you receive after scoping.
The almost-ready AI build covers the proven feature set. Custom tier structures or allocation modes add scoped estimate work.
Network deployments and snapshot schedules are configured per chain. Adding chains means more configuration, never a rebuild.
Wallet SDKs, KYC vendors, and audit partners are wired during the build, and each integration is estimated individually.
Out of the box, risk screening, allocation analytics, and staking intelligence are pre-tuned for tiered IDOs. Training models on your sale history is an optional, separately scoped workstream.
Each ships as an optional module on the same contract core, scoped separately.
Additional lottery mechanics beyond the standard tier structure, including weighted draws and hybrid guaranteed-plus-lottery rounds, for pads that want more allocation variety per sale.
A structured incubation tier: launch readiness reviews, tokenomics consultations, and audit coordination packaged as a service line with its own pricing.
Community voting over project selection and platform decisions, with token-weighted or tier-weighted rules, turning your staking base into a governed community.
Run the pad as a platform for sub-operators or per-chain instances, each with its own branding, tiers, and fees, on one codebase you own.
A post-launch swap surface with commission per trade, so tokens that launch on your pad trade on infrastructure you own rather than leaking away.
Tier economics with engineering discipline.
Allocation logic runs on-chain against staked balances and published snapshots, which is what sophisticated IDO audiences check before they commit.
Contracts ship with invariant tests and defined audit scope before deployment, refined across 9,000+ delivered projects since 2010.
One hundred percent of source code and contracts transfers to you. No per-raise royalties, no black-box dependencies.
This build sits beside our MEXC-style exchange track, so tokens that launch on your pad can list on your venue.
Canonical deployments from our own portfolio. Metrics are reported from live platforms, not projections.
A consumer engagement platform from the same engineering system, proving the stack holds attention at campaign scale.
A consumer platform from the same engineering system, proving the infrastructure core holds under real-time load with strict uptime demands.
A high-traffic consumer platform our team ships and operates at national-carrier scale, the same discipline applied to every launch.
A tiered pad holds staked capital and sale contributions. The controls that protect both are built in, and stated plainly.
Staked balances sit in audited staking contracts with on-chain reward accrual, not in an operator wallet, so tier power is a chain fact rather than an account entry.
Snapshot reads and tier computation run in contracts at published times, so no back-office list can quietly move an allocation between participants.
Contributions, caps, and refund paths execute inside the sale contract, and vesting releases read on-chain schedules, leaving no discretionary step between participants and their allocations.
Contract administration runs behind timelocks with role-based access and audit logs, so a compromised admin key cannot instantly rewrite tier math on a live sale.
Past-performance pages publish historical sale outcomes openly, which is what repeat IDO participants check before staking, and what makes your approval record a public asset.
the process
You begin with a discovery call over chains, tier structure, and allocation modes, then receive a written scope and quote. The almost-ready AI path launches in 6 working days: branding applied, tier and sale contracts deployed, staking configured with lock periods and snapshot schedules, and pilot IDOs run end to end through registration, contribution, and vesting claims. Custom tier structures and extra chains are estimated per module in writing.
Post-launch you have post-launch support and product updates included, covering bug fixes and chain compatibility. The first 90 days are a credibility-building phase: seeding the staking pool with your earliest community, publishing snapshot timing and keeping it exact, running the first sales with transparent results pages, and holding your approval standard even when it costs a listing fee. Tiered pads live on the honesty of their math, and the contracts make that honesty enforceable.
Open the web app, sign in with the printed demo credentials, or install the Android build — no signup, no sales call. What you see is what you launch.
Access: Available on request
$ moxace launch --nowBook a free consultation and get your launch plan.
Share your idea
a quick call, no deck required
See the live demo
every screen, admin to user
Launch with source
full code, your brand, your servers
Moxace is an independent software development company. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by BSCPad.
The phrase “BSCPad clone” is used descriptively. It is how the software industry refers to building a platform with similar functionality, and how buyers search for one.
The design and codebase are built entirely by our in-house team. Nothing is taken from the BSCPad website, applications, or brand assets.
BSCPad and all third-party names and marks remain the property of their respective owners, referenced here only to describe the category of software we build.
Read the full legal notice on our disclaimer page.